An Evaluation of Thermosyphon Heat Pipe Charged R134a and R600a Using Machine-Learning Algorithms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/CAST.2025.8103Abstract
Thermosyphon Heat Pipe (THP) is a heat transfer device that consists of three sections with working fluid inside, including evaporator, adiabatic, and condenser. The refrigerants in thermosyphons are commonly used for low-temperature applications. In this article, two higher heat transfer refrigerants, namely R600a and R134a, are used as the working fluid in thermosyphon to compare their performance. The total thermal resistance of the refrigerant R600a and R134a charged thermosyphon was calculated using experimental results, and it shows that R600a provides lower thermal resistance than R134a. Experimental results show that the heat transfer of R600a increases by 12% than R134a. The temperature at the evaporator and condenser section provides the performance of the thermosyphon. Therefore, in addition to the experimental results, three different machine-learning methods such as support vector machine supporting vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network artificial neural networks (ANN) and convolutional neural network Convolution Neural Network (CNN) are deployed to classify the efficiency of the experimental process and find the accuracy of the output using these methods. These approaches are used to diagnose the temperature with the input parameters such as the ratio between length to diameter, condenser to evaporator length, thermal conductivity of working fluid, boiling point of working fluid, temperature of the cooling water, applied heat flux and heat input. The neural schema applied over the measured temperature obtained from the experimental results was optimized with the algorithmic approach which provides the relative grade. In this article, the classifiers are used to compare the performance of the refrigerants and measure the accuracy of the evaluation for R600a and R134a.
References
Abas, N., Kalair, A. R., Khan, N., Haider, A., Saleem, Z., & Saleem, M. S. (2018). Natural and synthetic refrigerants, global warming: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.099
Anand, R. S., Jawahar, C. P., Brusly Solomon, A., Benson, V., & Alan, A. (2020). K, K.P. Vignesh Nair, V.A. Alan, Experimental studies on thermosyphon using low global warming potential refrigerant HFE7000 and nanorefrigerant HFE7000/Al2O3. Part e J. Process Mech. Eng., 0, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408919896690
Celen, A., Çebi, A., Aktas, M., Mahian, O., Dalkilic, A. S., & Wongwises, S. (2014). A review of nanorefrigerants: Flow characteristics and applications. International Journal of Refrigeration, 44, 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.05.009
Fichera, A., & Pagano, A. (2002). Neural network-based prediction of the oscillating behaviour of a closed loop thermosyphon. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 45(18), 3875–3884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(02)00095-9
Gorecki, G. (2018). Investigation of two-phase thermosyphon performance filled with modern HFC refrigerants. Heat and Mass Transfer, 54(7), 2131–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2264-4
Jafari, D., Franco, A., Filippeschi, S., & Di Marco, P. (2016). Two-phase closed thermosyphons: A review of studies and solar applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.002
Kasaeian, A., Hosseini, S. M., Sheikhpour, M., Mahian, O., Yan, W.-M., & Wongwises, S. (2018). Applications of eco-friendly refrigerants and nanorefrigerants: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 96, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.033
Ma, L., Shang, L., Zhong, D., & Ji, Z. (2017). Experimental investigation of a two-phase closed thermosyphon charged with hydrocarbon and Freon refrigerants. Applied Energy, 207, 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.100
Maleki, A., Elahi, M., Assad, M. E. H., Alhuyi Nazari, M., Safdari Shadloo, M., & Nabipour, N. (2021). Thermal conductivity modeling of nanofluids with ZnO particles by using approaches based on artificial neural network and MARS. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 143(6), 4261–4272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09373-9
Naresh, Y., & Balaji, C. (2018). Thermal performance of an internally finned two phase closed thermosyphon with refrigerant R134a: A combined experimental and numerical study. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 126, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.11.033
Ong, K. S., Goh, G., Tshai, K. H., & Chin, W. M. (2016). Thermal resistance of a thermosyphon filled with R410A operating at low evaporator temperature. Applied Thermal Engineering, 106, 1345–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.080
Ong, K. S., & Haider-e-Alahi, M. (2003). Performance of a R-134a-filled thermosyphon. Applied Thermal Engineering, 23(18), 2373–2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00207-2
Payakaruk, T., Terdtoon, P., & Ritthidech, S. (2000). Correlations to predict heat transfer characteristics of an inclined closed two-phase thermosyphon at normal operating conditions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 20(9), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(99)00047-2
Shanbedi, M., Amiri, A., Rashidi, S., Heris, S. Z., & Baniadam, M. (2015). Thermal performance prediction of two-phase closed thermosyphon using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Heat Transfer Engineering, 36(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2014.916161
Sukchana, T., & Pratinthong, N. (2016). A two-phase closed thermosyphon with an adiabatic section using a flexible hose and R-134a filling. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 77, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.04.027
Zhang, H., Shao, S., Tian, C., & Zhang, K. (2018). A review on thermosyphon and its integrated system with vapor compression for free cooling of data centers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.011